Blog Layout

What's Hot In Architecture 2024 No 3

Mark Muir • 27 March 2024

Lower Footprint Materials - Laminated Timber v Steel

In the pursuit of sustainable construction practices, the choice between laminated timber and steel holds significant weight, particularly in terms of their whole life carbon footprint. Let's dissect the advantages of each material to ascertain which holds the upper hand in minimising carbon emissions throughout their lifespan.


Laminated timber emerges as a frontrunner in the race against carbon emissions. Sourced from responsibly managed forests, timber acts as a carbon sink, sequestering CO2 throughout its growth cycle. This inherent carbon storage continues post-harvest, as timber products retain captured carbon within their structures. Furthermore, the manufacturing process of laminated timber consumes substantially less energy compared to steel production, resulting in lower embodied carbon. Additionally, timber structures can be easily disassembled and repurposed, prolonging their lifespan and mitigating carbon emissions associated with demolition and disposal.


On the other hand, steel presents a mixed bag in terms of its carbon footprint. While steel boasts high durability and recyclability, its production entails significant energy consumption and carbon emissions. Extracting iron ore, refining it into steel, and shaping it into usable forms demand substantial energy inputs, contributing to a hefty embodied carbon footprint. However, steel's longevity and recyclability offer opportunities to offset its initial carbon emissions through extended use and closed-loop material cycles.


So, which material emerges as the victor in the battle against whole life carbon emissions? Laminated timber's innate carbon sequestration, coupled with its low-energy manufacturing process and potential for reuse, positions it as a formidable contender. Steel, while offering durability and recyclability, struggles to match timber's carbon storage capabilities and energy-efficient production processes.


In conclusion, when evaluating building materials through the lens of whole life carbon emissions, laminated timber emerges as the superior choice. Its natural carbon sequestration, coupled with low-energy manufacturing and potential for reuse, sets a high bar for sustainable construction practices. By prioritising materials that minimise carbon footprints throughout their lifecycle, we pave the way for a more resilient and environmentally conscious built environment.

#MarkMuirArchitect #SustainableArchitecture #ContemporaryDesign

by Mark Muir 13 April 2025
Do House Extensions Really Add Value??
by Mark Muir 13 April 2025
Building for a Changing Future
by Mark Muir 13 April 2025
Imagine this:
by Mark Muir 2 April 2025
As travel becomes more experience-driven, hotels are evolving beyond mere accommodations..... 
by Mark Muir 30 March 2025
Nunney Castle 
by Mark Muir 24 March 2025
Sometimes is like answering how long is a piece of string........
by Mark Muir 24 March 2025
It’s up to you to seize these moments.
by Mark Muir 20 March 2025
Expansion of Circular Economy Practices
by Mark Muir 14 March 2025
Is A House Extension Worth It?
by Mark Muir 10 March 2025
Prefabrication is gaining traction for its efficiency and cost-effectiveness, enabling faster assembly and reduced waste, which is particularly beneficial in addressing urban housing shortages.
More posts
Share by: